Patent Position Review
Executive01Cover02Purpose03Legal Qualification04Why This Patent Is Different05Target Ranking06U.S. Market Presence

Executive Position — Page 05 · Section 04

Target Ranking

Seven companies and platform groups form the primary U.S. review universe. Each carries five separate scores; sort the dashboard by any one of them.

Preliminary Patent-Position Investigation Score – not a legal conclusion.

Sort by

How much of the disclosed company architecture appears potentially relevant to the patent architecture.

#Company / platform groupTechnical overlapEvidence confidenceU.S. relevanceArchitecture coverageCommercial priorityElements disclosed
01mOOvement

U.S. presence identified in Fort Worth, Texas.

969391949016 ● / 3
02AgriWebb

Denver, Colorado office and U.S. product operation.

949695929312 ● / 4
03701x

Domestic U.S. company with U.S.-marketed hardware and software and publicly marked U.S. patents.

9298100959816 ● / 2
04Halter

Dedicated U.S. product offering with U.S. beef and ranch product pages.

919897919713 ● / 3
05Gallagher eShepherd

eShepherd deployments and customer activity documented in South Dakota, Illinois and Texas.

889898899512 ● / 2
06CERES TAG

Animal Health Express announced as first U.S. distributor in 2023; a 2025 partnership with Jeffers broadened U.S. availability including through Alabama and Florida retail operations and distribution.

869792848510 ● / 3
07Merck Animal Health — Vence & SenseHub

Vence publicly described as available in the United States; SenseHub Feedlot and SenseHub Dairy deployed at scale in the U.S.

8599100889812 ● / 3

mOOvement

Initial rank 01
Technical overlap96/100
Evidence confidence93/100
U.S. relevance91/100
Architecture coverage94/100
Commercial priority90/100
Open company review →

AgriWebb

Initial rank 02
Technical overlap94/100
Evidence confidence96/100
U.S. relevance95/100
Architecture coverage92/100
Commercial priority93/100
Open company review →

701x

Initial rank 03
Technical overlap92/100
Evidence confidence98/100
U.S. relevance100/100
Architecture coverage95/100
Commercial priority98/100
Open company review →

Halter

Initial rank 04
Technical overlap91/100
Evidence confidence98/100
U.S. relevance97/100
Architecture coverage91/100
Commercial priority97/100
Open company review →

Gallagher eShepherd

Initial rank 05
Technical overlap88/100
Evidence confidence98/100
U.S. relevance98/100
Architecture coverage89/100
Commercial priority95/100
Open company review →

CERES TAG

Initial rank 06
Technical overlap86/100
Evidence confidence97/100
U.S. relevance92/100
Architecture coverage84/100
Commercial priority85/100
Open company review →

Merck Animal Health — Vence & SenseHub

Initial rank 07
Technical overlap85/100
Evidence confidence99/100
U.S. relevance100/100
Architecture coverage88/100
Commercial priority98/100
Open company review →

Technical Overlap Score

How much of the disclosed company architecture appears potentially relevant to the patent architecture.

Evidence Confidence Score

Quality and specificity of publicly available evidence. 98–100 indicates current corporate product pages, manuals, technical documentation or patent filings; below 80 indicates material functionality requiring inference.

U.S. Deployment Relevance

Extent to which the technology is publicly demonstrated as sold, deployed, offered, supported, distributed or operated within the United States. Headquarters location is not determinative.

Patent Architecture Coverage

Separate from generic similarity: how much of the combined Kahler architecture is represented in reviewed public disclosure.

Commercial Review Priority

Combination of technical overlap, U.S. deployment, company scale, market trajectory, strategic importance and apparent platform convergence.

Prohibited combination

These five values are never combined into a “probability of infringement”. They order investigation effort only.