United States Patent Position
System and Method of Determining Unusual or Emergency Occurrences Within a Livestock Property
An analysis of the technical correspondence between this patent architecture and publicly disclosed technologies operating within the livestock monitoring, property intelligence, virtual fencing, sensor integration and event-response market in the United States.
U.S. application number
U.S. Application No. 19/121,783
Publication number
US 2026/0134767 A1
Current USPTO status
Allowed — issue fee paid; patent not yet issued
Applicant / assignee
Andrew Kahler
Inventor
Andrew Kahler
Jurisdiction
United States — Australia (secondary filing)
Priority date
Established by the official USPTO file record; record extract available to reviewing counsel
Filing date
Established by the official USPTO file record; record extract available to reviewing counsel
Issue date / patent number
Not yet issued; issue fee paid
The application stands allowed and the issue fee has been paid. The matter is not described as granted or issued, and no issued claim text is relied upon, until the patent formally issues and the issued number is recorded here.
Scope of analysis
Technical correspondence, evidence and claim analysis
The analysis distinguishes architecture-level correspondence from correspondence with the limitations of an independent claim, and identifies where implementation-level evidence would be required for any claim-level conclusion.
Platforms examined
Highest identified technical correspondence
Additional platforms are examined in the detailed sections of the analysis.
Legal analysis notice
Applicable standard
This analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and is provided for the purpose of evaluating technical correspondence and potential strategic relevance of the identified U.S. patent position. References to patent claims, claim limitations, technical correspondence or potentially relevant functionality should be considered in the context of applicable U.S. patent law. Any formal determination concerning infringement, validity, enforceability or freedom to operate would require appropriate legal analysis, including claim construction and consideration of relevant implementation facts, prosecution history and other evidence.
Reference: U.S. Application No. 19/121,783 | Publication US 2026/0134767 A1