U.S. Patent Position and Market Correspondence

This analysis examines the relationship between the patent architecture and publicly disclosed technologies operating within the livestock monitoring, property intelligence, virtual fencing, sensor integration and event-response market. It is based on publicly available technical and commercial evidence and is intended to identify areas warranting further claim-level and implementation-level analysis.

U.S. Application No. 19/121,783 | Publication US 2026/0134767 A1 · Allowed — issue fee paid; patent not yet issued

Subject matter

What the patent architecture addresses

A digital representation of a livestock property, including boundary, zones and fixed features
Association of livestock with the property and with particular zones
Data received from distributed property sensors and external information services
Determination that an unusual occurrence or emergency situation is occurring
Determination of severity from event category and property context
Alert generation reflecting determined severity
Determination of recommended remedial action

Analytical basis

Publicly available evidence

Every substantive technical assertion in this analysis is traceable to a source recorded in the evidence register, classified by source type and date, with the limits of that source recorded alongside it.

Open the evidence register →

Analytical limits

Architecture and claim analysis are separate

Correspondence with the broader technical architecture does not establish correspondence with every limitation of an independent claim. The two layers are analysed separately.

Architecture analysis vs claim analysis →

Platforms presently showing the highest technical correspondence

The five platforms below carry the highest architecture correspondence identified within this review. Classification reflects publicly available technical and commercial evidence and does not express any conclusion concerning infringement, validity or enforceability.

mOOvement

Very High

mOOvement strongly demonstrates the sensor / property / livestock foundation; the patent architecture extends that foundation toward multi-event intelligence, severity and response orchestration.

Open platform analysis →

AgriWebb

High

AgriWebb publicly demonstrates one of the strongest digital property models in the reviewed universe; the patent position concerns the determination, severity and response layers built on top of that model.

Open platform analysis →

701x

High

701x publicly demonstrates many of the underlying property, animal, sensor and infrastructure primitives. The patent position should be analysed particularly at the intelligence / orchestration layer connecting those primitives into emergency determination and response.

Open platform analysis →

Halter

High

Halter is an important example of animal + zone + location + behaviour + digital operational control, while the patent architecture addresses animal + property + fixed infrastructure + external emergency + severity + remedial response.

Open platform analysis →

Gallagher

Moderate

Gallagher's U.S. eShepherd activity is documented across multiple states; the reviewed disclosure does not establish the multi-hazard, severity and remedial-response architecture of the patent.

Open platform analysis →

Comparative landscape

The comparative landscape sets the five platforms against twelve architecture groups and against one another, using confirmed, partial and not-identified evidence states.

Open the comparative landscape →

Independent claim analysis

The claim-level layer separates each independent claim into limitations and records the publicly identified functionality, the supporting evidence and the implementation evidence that would be required.

Open the independent claim analysis →